1. If the Book of Revelation was written after 70AD, then Optimistic Eschatology loses its foundation. History points to a 90AD to 95AD authorship. The majority of scholars agree. If your whole house loses its foundation based upon the dating of one book, then maybe you have built upon a faulty foundation ?
2.The optimistic eschatologist “leads” you to believe that the Greek word “ge” is only used to refer to a local inhabited civilization or to the land of a particular nation. They need this definition to be accepted so they can “prove” that the Book of Revelation and 2 Peter 3:10 refer to Jerusalem and Israel in 70AD.
Here are two of at least 150 clear examples that “ge” refers to much more than a local civilization.
1 Corinthians 10:26 “ For the earth is the Lord’s, and the fulness thereof.”
Hebrews 1:10 “ Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:”
The Greek word “ge” can refer to a specific location. For example
Matthew 2:21 “And he arose, and took the young child and his mother, and came into the land of Israel.”
But do you see the difference ? The context determines how to determine what “ge” is referring to. In the Matthew passage they are leaving Egypt and entering the land of Israel. “Ge” is obviously referring to one local inhabited civilization to another.
Now look at 2 Peter 3. The whole chapter speaks of creation and the judgment of the flood. Neither of those were local events. Only someone practicing eisegesis could come to the conclusion that Peter was writing about 70AD. Eisegesis is the transferring of one’s own opinion, bias, or filter upon a passage of Scripture. It is actually a form of control and manipulation. Apply the same principle to the usage of the Greek word “ge” to the Book of Revelation and you will understand that it is written for the whole church, throughout the whole earth, for all of our days, until the consummation of all things.
3. Optimistic eshcatologists need you to believe that Nero was the antichrist so that the events of the Book of Revelaton fit into their 70AD timeline. Nero died on June the 9th in 68AD. Vespasian was the actually Emperor who lived during the events of 70AD. His son Titus oversaw the sacking and destroying of Jerusalem. So why do they claim Nero was the Antichrist ? Because they need him to be. Optomistic eschatologists use a form of historical eisegesis to get this one to work. They force their filter upon history combined with bits of the Bible. Some in the early church expected Nero to come back from the dead and reign as the antichrist. Nero was a shadow of the antichrist. Just like Antiochus Epiphanes was. Or Hitler. He was definitely evil but did not come near to fulfilling anything expected of the antichrist.
4. Mathew 24:34 “Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.” Optimistic eschatologists need a generation to be 40 years so that this verse and all of the Olivet discourse and the Book of Revelation applies to the people living in the days preceding 70AD. A generation is never defined as 40 years. It could be 70 or 38. Or 116 or 52. The point is that deciding a generation is 40 years is another form of eisegesis. Forcing your filter, view or bias on a passage. Did the generation that was alive in 70 AD experience Mattew 24:30,31 ?
“And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.”
If they did then there is no return of the Lord for this generation or even the next. The Second Coming already took place.
5. Optimistic eschatologists distort the historical record. The belief in the antichrist (future and personal) was in the early church. There is no reference to 70AD in any way other than as a fulfillment of Jesus’ prophecy. There is no “chatter” among the church fathers of all the amazing things that happened and were fulfilled by the destruction of Jerusalem. Chiliasm (the belief in a future 1,000 year reign of the returned Lord upon the actual earth) was the predominant view. The Roman Catholic Church began killing chiliasts systematically in later years. The Roman Church needed to eradicate those who believed in the return and rule of Christ, because it conflicted with its elevation of the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church to a place of dominion over the earth.
The oldest known complete commentary that we have from the early church is Hippolytus’ Commentary on the Book of Daniel (210 A.D.) In that commentary, the future reign of Christ on earth is discussed. Hippolytus also wrote of a future desolation by a coming antichrist and compared it to the desecration committed by Anitochus Epiphanes. He also referred to “the final week of the world”.
Tertullian (160AD to 220) even commented on the two witnesses in Revelation 11 and said,
“Enoch was translated and so was Elijah. They did not experience death because it was postponed. They have been reserved for the suffering of death, so that by their blood they may extinguish the Antichrist.